Entradas

NEW ARTICLE POSTED IN DISIDENTIA / NUEVO ARTICULO PUBLICADO EN DISIDENTIA

Imagen
HACIA LA CONSTITUCIONALIZACIÓN DE LA DISCRIMINACIÓN POR RAZON DE GÉNERO
"Se está usando la reforma del artículo 49 de la Constitución a modo de caballo de Troya para introducir la discriminación por razón de género en nuestra constitución"

CLICK AL ARTICULO COMPLETO / CLICK TO FULL ARTICLE

ROYAL DREAMS OF ALBUDEITE: SEVERAL CASES WON / VARIOS CASOS GANADOS

Imagen
SEVERAL JUDGEMENTS SENTENCE SABADELL BANK TO REFUND DEPOSITS TO ROYAL DREAM OF ALBUDEITE'S BUYERS (SOLERA EL TRAMPOLIN)

Different Courts from Alicante and Valencia have sentenced Banco Sabadell (former CAM Bank) to refund deposits plus interest to buyers represented by GM LEGAL EXPERTS head lawyer, Guadalupe Sánchez.
Courts found that plaintiffs proved that CAM Bank was the one appointed by the builder, Solera El Trampolin, to get deposits from purchasers in Albudeite, given that internal bank's reports show that CAM had knowledge of the resort' details, so any deposit made into that account should have been guaranteed under the provisions of the 57/68 Act.
For any additional question about these cases, please do not hesitate to contact us.
VARIAS SENTENCIAS CONDENAN A BANCO SABADELL A DEVOLVER A COMPRADORES DEL RESORT ROYAL DREAMS OF ALBUDEITE LAS CANTIDADES ENTREGADAS A CUENTA
Distintos tribunales de Alicante y Valencia han condenado a Banco Sabadell (anteriormente CAM B…

SANTA ANA DEL MONTE (GRUPO SAN JOSE): ANOTHER CASE WON / OTRO CASO GANADO

Imagen
HIGH COURT SET A NEW PRECEDENT UP ABOUT SANTA ANA DEL MONTE'S CASES AGAINST BANKS
A large class action filed in behalf of Santa Ana del Monte's buyers was rejected several years ago by Alicante's Courts, because they interpreted that buyers who accepted the builder's payment proposal in the meeting of creditors' proceeding, waived to the bank guarantee regulated by 57/68, because Spanish Civil Code states that any amendment to the debt agreed between debtor & creditor without the guarantor's consent implies that cancellation of the bank guarantee. 
We decided to take the case to High Court, because bank guarantees for buyers deposits shouldn't be considered regular guarantees, but specials, given that they are regulated on a specific law, 57/68 Act, which forces builder and banks to guarantee the refund if the factor addressed by the law are found by courts, and states that these guaranteed can't be waived. This means that is a guarantee imposed by la…

NEW ARTICLE POSTED IN DISIDENTIA / NUEVO ARTÍCULO PUBLICADO EN DISIDENTIA

Imagen
EL ESPUTO DE LA VICEPRESIDENTA CARMEN CALVO A LA DIVISIÓN DE PODERES

"El pasado miércoles, en la sesión de control al gobierno en el Congreso, el escupitajo de un diputado independentista de ERC al Ministro de Exteriores Borrell no fue el único que se produjo en el hemiciclo. La vicepresidenta Carmen Calvo también aprovechó su réplica a la intervención de Girauta sobre la independencia judicial para, en sentido metafórico, esputar sobre la separación de poderes y el Estado de derecho. Se trata, en mi opinión, de un escupitajo tanto o más grave que el anterior sobre el que pocos repararon".

CLICK AL ARTÍCULO COMPLETO / CLICK TO FULL ARTICLE
PINCHE EN EL ENLACE PARA LEER EL ARTÍCULO COMPLETO

TRAMPOLIN HILLS GOLF RESORT: ANOTHER CASE WON / OTRO CASO GANADO

Imagen
TWO MORE JUDGEMENTS AGAINST TRAMPOLIN HILLS' BANKS
Two more judgements from Valencia Courts have sentenced Caixabank & Cajamar to refund deposits to Trampolin Hills buyers.
The sentences declare that bank’s liability applies as long as they were not only depositaries of the deposits but also jointly guarantors, although no individual bank guarantees were given to the buyers we represent.
The judgement includes the payment of the legal interest from the date of the deposit’s payment to the developer, which roughly is 3% per year.
Obviously, Banks have appealed both judgements, but we do expect that they are confirmed by the appeal court.
If you have also paid money for an off plan property that wasn’t completed in time, is time for you to contact us.


DOS NUEVAS SENTENCIAS CONDENAN A LAS ENTIDADES BANCARIAS IMPLICADAS EN LA PROMOCIÓN TRAMPOLÍN HILLS
Dos nuevas sentencias de juzgados de Valenciacondenan a Caixabank y a Cajamar a pagar a compradores de la promoción Trampolín Hills Golf R…

NEW ARTICLE POSTED IN DISIDENTIA / NUEVO ARTÍCULO PUBLICADO EN DISIDENTIA

Imagen
WHEN THE INTERESTS OF THE STATE ARE CONFUSED WITH THOSE OF THE GOVERNMENT: "That the agreement reached by the PSOE with Podemos and the nationalist and independence parties went far beyond the mere motion of censure, and that we are facing a real government pact , something that virtually nobody dares to question, except the hooligans professionals.And that the facts of the coetaneous and post-covenant have only served to throw certainty on the meaning and content of the agreements reached is also quite evident."

CUANDO LOS INTERESES DEL ESTADO SE CONFUNDEN CON LOS DEL GOBIERNO: "Que el acuerdo alcanzado por el PSOE con Podemos y los partidos nacionalistas e independentistas iba mucho más allá de la mera moción de censura, y que nos encontramos ante un auténtico pacto de gobierno, es algo que prácticamente nadie se atreve a cuestionar, salvo los hooligans profesionales. Y que los hechos coetáneos y posteriores al pacto no han hecho más que arrojar certidumbre sobre el se…

FINAL HIGH COURT DECISION ABOUT MORTGAGE TAX / LA DECISION DEL SUPREMO SOBRE EL IMPUESTO DE LAS HIPOTECAS

Imagen
After two days of private deliberations, last Tuesday High Court plenary made a controversial decision and amended it’s previous precedent about the payment of the mortgage tax: 15 days after sentencing that are banks who should pay the tax,  they stated that tax debtor should be the borrower.  A few hours after this controversial judgement, Spanish government announced that mortgage tax law is being amended, so banks pay the mortgage tax from now on.

So what does it means this scenario for you? Obviously, new court decision prevent borrowers to claim directly the refund to tax office. But we highly believe that you still should claim for your mortgage tax refund, together with other mortgage expenses, under certain conditions.
Who is entitled to claim?

Individuals or even companies who are legal considered consumers: people who mortgage their principal or holiday home. Those whose business was to purchase, sale or built properties fall outside of the scope of the consumers’ protection la…